Upcoming/Recent Events
Citizen's Forum
Mon., Jan. 23
Ward 5 Update
Read Meeting Agenda
Archive of Past Events
The Issues
What Your Neighbors are Saying
en español

|
HOLYOKE MASSACHUSETTS WARD 5 CITY COUNCILOR |
 |
THANK YOU FOR GIVING ME THE OPPORTUNITY TO SERVE YOU AS YOUR WARD 5 CITY COUNCILOR!
I promise to work hard and do the best job I can for you and Holyoke
SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT
It was Christmas Eve and the City Council was once again debating the tax rate due to a Mayoral veto of the original rate. During the debate, figures had been put forth describing the effect of the different rates on the total tax bill of the average homeowner. It had been made clear that the taxes for the average homeowner would increase at least $200.00 regardless of which rate we chose.
The reason we have this debate every year is that Holyoke has a split tax rate. The average tax rate would be 23.06 per thousand for every tax payer if we had a single rate. The split tax rate places a greater tax burden on business owners rather than homeowners. So anything over 1.0 is a shift to the business owners. Last year we approved a 1.68 tax rate for home owners. The Mayor’s tax panel recommended shifting toward 1.5 and our Mayor recommended 1.65. This year the city council approved 1.67.
Late in the discussion, Councilor Rebecca Lisi made a statement that I was wrong when I said the difference in the taxes was $50-$55.00 (per average home owner). She took my comment out of context. It was clear if one followed the debate, that I was referring to last year and comparing the effects of one tax rate to another (from year to year). Other councilors understood the point I was making. The tax rate of 1.68 that we passed last year (2010) increased the average home owner’s tax bill by $50 more than it would have been (if the higher proposed rate passed).
We had the same debate this year. It was correctly pointed out by another councilor that the difference we were debating was $87.00 when looking at the Mayor’s proposed rate. I was referring to the differences between the proposed rates this year with those of last year. The rate that the Mayor proposed would have “saved” the average homeowner approximately $87.00 on their tax bill compared to the 1.6 rate.
In the end, the approved rate of 1.67 will result in a tax increase of $200.00 for the average homeowner and almost $800.00 on average for business. As a councilor who has consistently voted against excessive spending, this is too much. It is time to reduce our spending and live within our means. Both homeowners and businesses agree on one thing. Taxes are too high.
If Councilor Lisi wants to say I am wrong, she should get her facts straight first. I have a reputation for doing my homework and making well informed comments. While I do not object to a difference of opinion, I do object to a misrepresentation of my comments. My approach to city government comes from the goal of positive growth for homeowners and businesses alike. After all many of our business owners are homeowners too. We are all in this together.
|
As your Ward 5 City Councilor, I will continue to represent you:
By hearing concerns and ideas from residents.
By serving on committees to make things happen.
By making informed decisions.
By keeping you informed on issues and decisions that affect you.
|
|
Getting to know Linda:
Professional Profile
Contact Linda
Support Linda
Please feel free to contact me by phone 210-6077 (cell) 533-6498 (home) or use the Contact form with any questions
you may have. Thank you, Linda
|
4 important local issues, my perspective:
..... Click here to continue reading
First: Our local government needs to be affordable, efficient and effective for the residents. Homeowners and small businesses cannot continue to pay more and more, so the size of our local government must fall in line with the available revenues. Rather than increase taxes even more, we need to provide the essential government services, which include police, fire and public works. Other programs need to be evaluated for affordability and value to the taxpayers.
Second: Our City Council is established to represent our city. When Holyoke had 60,000 residents, the fifteen-member Council was large, even then. Now with the population less than 40,000, the size of the Council is disproportionately high.
Third: I favor the establishment of a City Charter review committee. It is a healthy process for us to re-evaluate our current government structure to see if we can better serve our residents. Many believe that the current model results in a high level of in-fighting between factions on the Council and frequent power struggles with the Mayor. Many wonder if the interests of the residents are well served. I am open to hearing new ideas, have set forth some thoughts on the matter in another section of this web site and look forward to input, discussion and vigorous debate on this topic.
Fourth: I will not promise my vote on a matter before I have listened to constituents, considered input from concerned citizens, and become well informed on the subject. When I do decide on a matter, I will share the reasons for my decisions. While it is impossible to please all of the people all of the time, it is possible to conduct public business in a manner that is open, responsive and has integrity.
I look forward to the opportunity to serve you.
Sincerely,
Linda Vacon
Finished reading, close document
More views on Local Issues
Residential & Commercial Property Tax Issue
See more info HERE.......
|
"Helping to Keep You Informed"
Holyoke City Resources
City of Holyoke
Ward 5 Maps, Where to Vote
Absentee Voter Information
City of Holyoke Public Meeting Calendar
Holyoke Property Viewer
Holyoke Police Department
Emergency: 911
Non-emergency: 536-6431
Anonymous "Tips Line": 533-TIPS (533-8477)
Police Arrest and Call logs
|